7 Comments
User's avatar
Gabriel Cazorla Persson's avatar

"I thought Novo Nordisk was an example of “quality at a fair price” back in February at 29x earnings. I bought a starting position at that time. It is currently priced at 17x trailing earnings or 14x forward earnings. I now consider it to be undervalued."

Well, that is what many great investors like Sir John Templeton did, they would invest in pockets of extreme pessimism, while keeping a list of good stocks, but invest only in them when they were greatly undervalued. In my opinion, stocks like this are too volatile to settle with just fairly priced.

Expand full comment
Stock Doctor's avatar

A fair opinion.

Expand full comment
Steven's avatar

I like your style

Expand full comment
James Lufkin's avatar

I think your analysis is spot on. Thank you for sharing. My main question now is why has NN been so slow to submit oral Semaglutide for FDA approval? Oasis 1 was 2023. Seems like they left the door open for Lilly to steal spotlight and free marketing when

they had the lead.

Expand full comment
Biotech Bagholder's avatar

Good read. I must admit it is attractive. Is there any difference in the safety profile of the NVO/LLY pipeline?

Expand full comment
Stock Doctor's avatar

Very similiar side effects. Mostly nausea which resolved with time.

Expand full comment
Tech Tornado's avatar

Great one

Expand full comment